architecture: be related to environmental science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents element
Weight: 0.65
, computer architecture
Weight: 0.64
, technology
Weight: 0.63
, sculpture
Weight: 0.62
Siblings castle
Weight: 0.61
, pyramid
Weight: 0.60
, topology
Weight: 0.54
, skyscraper
Weight: 0.49
, steeple
Weight: 0.44

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to environmental science 1.00
be related to science 0.91
be related science 0.91
be related physical science 0.88
be science 0.86
is science 0.86
be physical science 0.84
be considered science 0.84
be afraid of science 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(technology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(architecture, be related to environmental science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(architecture, be related to environmental science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(technology, be related to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(architecture, be related to environmental science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(technology, be related to science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(technology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(architecture, be related to environmental science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(architecture, be related to environmental science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(architecture, be related to environmental science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(architecture, be related to environmental science)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(architecture, be related to environmental science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(architecture, be related physical science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(architecture, be related to environmental science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(architecture, be related to science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(architecture, be related to environmental science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(architecture, be related science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(architecture, be related to environmental science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(architecture, be physical science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(architecture, be related to environmental science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(architecture, be physical science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(architecture, be related to environmental science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(architecture, be physical science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(architecture, be related to environmental science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(architecture, be related physical science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(architecture, be related to environmental science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(architecture, is science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(architecture, be related to environmental science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(architecture, be considered science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(architecture, be related to environmental science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(architecture, be related physical science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(architecture, be related to environmental science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(architecture, be afraid of science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(architecture, be related to environmental science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(architecture, is science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(architecture, be related to environmental science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(architecture, is science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(architecture, be related to environmental science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(architecture, be afraid of science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(architecture, be related to environmental science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(architecture, be related to science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(architecture, be related to environmental science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(architecture, be afraid of science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(architecture, be related to environmental science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(architecture, be considered science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(architecture, be related to environmental science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(architecture, be physical science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(architecture, be related to environmental science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(architecture, is science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(architecture, be related to environmental science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(architecture, be considered science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(architecture, be related to environmental science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(architecture, be related science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(architecture, be related to environmental science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(architecture, be related to science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(architecture, be related to environmental science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(architecture, be related physical science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(architecture, be related to environmental science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(architecture, be considered science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(architecture, be related to environmental science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(architecture, be afraid of science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(architecture, be related to environmental science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(architecture, be related science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(architecture, be related to environmental science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(architecture, be related to science)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(architecture, be related to environmental science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(architecture, be related science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(architecture, be related to environmental science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(architecture, be related to environmental science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(architecture, be related to environmental science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(architecture, be related to environmental science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(architecture, be related to environmental science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(architecture, be related to environmental science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(technology, be related to science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(architecture, be related to environmental science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(technology, be related to science)