architecture: be used in math

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents element
Weight: 0.65
, computer architecture
Weight: 0.64
, technology
Weight: 0.63
, sculpture
Weight: 0.62
Siblings castle
Weight: 0.61
, pyramid
Weight: 0.60
, topology
Weight: 0.54
, skyscraper
Weight: 0.49
, steeple
Weight: 0.44

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used in math 1.00
be physical science 0.78
be science 0.77
is science 0.76
be considered science 0.76
be related physical science 0.76
be related to science 0.75
be related science 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(technology, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(architecture, be used in math)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(architecture, be used in math)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(technology, be related to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(architecture, be used in math)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(technology, be related to science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(technology, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(architecture, be used in math)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(architecture, be used in math)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(architecture, be used in math)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(architecture, be used in math)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(architecture, be used in math)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(architecture, be physical science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(architecture, be used in math)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(architecture, be physical science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(architecture, be used in math)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(architecture, be physical science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(architecture, be used in math)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(architecture, be physical science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(architecture, be used in math)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(architecture, is science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(architecture, be used in math)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(architecture, is science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(architecture, be used in math)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(architecture, be related physical science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(architecture, be used in math)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(architecture, be related physical science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(architecture, be used in math)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(architecture, is science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(architecture, be used in math)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(architecture, be related physical science)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(architecture, be used in math)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(architecture, be considered science)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(architecture, be used in math)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(architecture, be considered science)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(architecture, be used in math)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(architecture, be considered science)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(architecture, be used in math)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(architecture, be related physical science)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(architecture, be used in math)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(architecture, be considered science)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(architecture, be used in math)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(architecture, is science)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(architecture, be used in math)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(architecture, be related to science)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(architecture, be used in math)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(architecture, be related to science)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(architecture, be used in math)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(architecture, be related to science)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(architecture, be used in math)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(architecture, be related science)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(architecture, be used in math)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(architecture, be related to science)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(architecture, be used in math)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(architecture, be related science)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(architecture, be used in math)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(architecture, be related science)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(architecture, be used in math)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(architecture, be related science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(architecture, be used in math)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(architecture, be used in math)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(architecture, be used in math)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(architecture, be used in math)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(architecture, be used in math)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(architecture, be used in math)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(technology, be related to science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(architecture, be used in math)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(technology, be related to science)