architecture: is good major

Related concepts

Parents	element Weight: 0.65 , technology Weight: 0.63 , sculpture Weight: 0.62
Siblings	castle Weight: 0.61 , pyramid Weight: 0.60 , skyscraper Weight: 0.49 , steeple Weight: 0.44

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is good major	1.00
is useless major	0.82
be significant to people	0.79
has quality good	0.78
is important to	0.77
were major egyptians arts	0.77
has quality bad	0.76
be important to world	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(sculpture, were major egyptians arts) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(architecture, is good major)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(technology, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(architecture, is good major)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(technology, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(architecture, is good major)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(technology, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(technology, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(sculpture, were major egyptians arts)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(technology, has quality bad)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(sculpture, were major egyptians arts)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(technology, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(skyscraper, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(castle, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(sculpture, were major egyptians arts) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(architecture, is good major)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(technology, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(architecture, is good major)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(technology, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(architecture, is good major)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(skyscraper, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(skyscraper, has quality good)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(castle, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(castle, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Salient(architecture, is good major)

Similarity expansion

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.90

Salient(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Salient(architecture, is useless major)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Plausible(architecture, is useless major)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Remarkable(architecture, is useless major)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.91

Typical(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(architecture, is useless major)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.90

Salient(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Salient(architecture, has quality bad)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.91

Typical(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(architecture, be significant to people)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Plausible(architecture, has quality bad)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.90

Salient(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Salient(architecture, be significant to people)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.91

Typical(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(architecture, has quality good)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.91

Typical(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(architecture, has quality bad)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.91

Typical(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(architecture, is important to)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(architecture, has quality bad)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(architecture, be significant to people)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.90

Salient(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(architecture, has quality good)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.91

Typical(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(architecture, be important to world)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.90

Salient(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Salient(architecture, be important to world)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.90

Salient(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(architecture, is important to)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(architecture, has quality good)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(architecture, be important to world)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(architecture, is important to)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(architecture, be important to world)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(architecture, be significant to people)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(architecture, has quality good)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(architecture, is important to)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.90

Salient(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(architecture, is good major)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(architecture, is good major)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(technology, has quality bad)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(technology, has quality good)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(sculpture, were major egyptians arts)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(skyscraper, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(castle, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.91

Typical(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(technology, has quality good)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.91

Typical(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(technology, has quality bad)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.91

Typical(architecture, is good major) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(sculpture, were major egyptians arts)