architecture: is science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents element
Weight: 0.65
, computer architecture
Weight: 0.64
, technology
Weight: 0.63
, sculpture
Weight: 0.62
Siblings castle
Weight: 0.61
, pyramid
Weight: 0.60
, topology
Weight: 0.54
, skyscraper
Weight: 0.49
, steeple
Weight: 0.44

Related properties

Property Similarity
is science 1.00
be science 0.99
be considered science 0.93
be physical science 0.92
be related to science 0.92
be related science 0.92
be afraid of science 0.88
be related physical science 0.88
be related to environmental science 0.86
be used in math 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(technology, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(architecture, is science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(technology, be related to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(technology, be related to science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(technology, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(architecture, is science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(architecture, is science)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(architecture, be physical science)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(architecture, be physical science)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(architecture, be physical science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(architecture, be afraid of science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(architecture, be afraid of science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(architecture, be afraid of science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(architecture, be physical science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(architecture, be used in math)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(architecture, be used in math)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(architecture, be used in math)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(architecture, be related physical science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(architecture, be related physical science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(architecture, be considered science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(architecture, be related physical science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(architecture, be considered science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(architecture, be considered science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(architecture, be related to science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(architecture, be considered science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(architecture, be used in math)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(architecture, be related science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(architecture, be afraid of science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(architecture, be related to environmental science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(architecture, be related to science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(architecture, be related physical science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(architecture, be related to science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(architecture, be related to environmental science)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(architecture, be related to science)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(architecture, be related science)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(architecture, be related to environmental science)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(architecture, be related science)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(architecture, be related to environmental science)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(architecture, be related science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(architecture, is science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(architecture, is science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(technology, be related to science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(architecture, is science)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(technology, be related to science)