arctic fox: has physical part noses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wildlife
Weight: 0.74
, polar bear
Weight: 0.74
, predator
Weight: 0.73
, species
Weight: 0.71
Siblings red fox
Weight: 0.71
, fox
Weight: 0.39
, snowy owl
Weight: 0.38
, squirrel
Weight: 0.38
, gray fox
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part noses 1.00
has physical part ears 0.84
has physical part paws 0.82
has physical part tails 0.81
has physical part legs 0.80
has physical part face 0.79
has physical part tail 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, has physical part tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part tail)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part legs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tail)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part ears)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part legs)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(fox, has physical part tail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part tail)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(squirrel, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(squirrel, has physical part tails)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(arctic fox, has physical part noses)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part face)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part paws)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part paws)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part face)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(arctic fox, has physical part paws)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part paws)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(arctic fox, has physical part face)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part face)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part noses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part noses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part ears)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part legs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(squirrel, has physical part tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tail)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tails)