arctic fox: has physical part tails

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wildlife
Weight: 0.74
, polar bear
Weight: 0.74
, predator
Weight: 0.73
, species
Weight: 0.71
Siblings red fox
Weight: 0.71
, fox
Weight: 0.39
, snowy owl
Weight: 0.38
, squirrel
Weight: 0.38
, gray fox
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part tails 1.00
have big tails 0.89
has physical part tail 0.89
has physical part legs 0.85
has physical part noses 0.81
has physical part paws 0.81
has physical part ears 0.81
have big bushy tails 0.81
have bushy tails 0.79
has physical part face 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, has physical part tails)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part tails)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part tail)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have big tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fox, have big tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part legs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, have bushy tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tail)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part legs)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(squirrel, has physical part tails)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part tails)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(fox, have bushy tails)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fox, have big tails)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fox, have big tails)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(fox, has physical part tail)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part tail)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part ears)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(squirrel, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(squirrel, have bushy tails)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(red fox, have big tails)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(red fox, have big tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(arctic fox, has physical part tails)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part noses)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have big tails)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(arctic fox, has physical part noses)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part noses)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part noses)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part face)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part paws)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have big tails)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big bushy tails)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have bushy tails)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part paws)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part face)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(arctic fox, has physical part paws)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(arctic fox, has physical part face)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part paws)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have bushy tails)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have bushy tails)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have big bushy tails)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have bushy tails)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have big bushy tails)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part face)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have big bushy tails)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(squirrel, has physical part tails)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tails)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part legs)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tail)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(red fox, have big tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fox, have big tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part ears)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fox, have bushy tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(squirrel, have bushy tails)