arctic fox: have coats

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wildlife
Weight: 0.74
, polar bear
Weight: 0.74
, predator
Weight: 0.73
, species
Weight: 0.71
Siblings red fox
Weight: 0.71
, fox
Weight: 0.39
, snowy owl
Weight: 0.38
, squirrel
Weight: 0.38
, gray fox
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have coats 1.00
have furry coats 0.91
have white fur 0.77
have thick fur 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have coats)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(polar bear, have white fur)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have coats)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(arctic fox, have coats)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(polar bear, have white fur)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(arctic fox, have coats)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(polar bear, have thick fur)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have coats)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have white fur)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have coats)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have coats)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have white fur)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have coats)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(arctic fox, have coats)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have coats)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(polar bear, have white fur)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(arctic fox, have coats)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have coats)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(arctic fox, have coats)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(red fox, have white fur)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(red fox, have white fur)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(arctic fox, have coats)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(red fox, have thick fur)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(arctic fox, have coats)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have coats)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(arctic fox, have coats)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have furry coats)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(arctic fox, have coats)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have white fur)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(arctic fox, have coats)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have white fur)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(arctic fox, have coats)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have white fur)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(arctic fox, have coats)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have white fur)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(arctic fox, have coats)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have furry coats)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(arctic fox, have coats)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have furry coats)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(arctic fox, have coats)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have thick fur)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(arctic fox, have coats)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have thick fur)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(arctic fox, have coats)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have thick fur)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(arctic fox, have coats)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick fur)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(arctic fox, have coats)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have furry coats)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(arctic fox, have coats)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have coats)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have coats)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(arctic fox, have coats)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have coats)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have coats)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(polar bear, have white fur)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have coats)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(polar bear, have thick fur)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have coats)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(red fox, have white fur)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have coats)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, have thick fur)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(arctic fox, have coats)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(polar bear, have white fur)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(arctic fox, have coats)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(polar bear, have thick fur)