arctic fox: have hind legs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wildlife
Weight: 0.74
, polar bear
Weight: 0.74
, predator
Weight: 0.73
, species
Weight: 0.71
Siblings red fox
Weight: 0.71
, fox
Weight: 0.39
, snowy owl
Weight: 0.38
, squirrel
Weight: 0.38
, gray fox
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have hind legs 1.00
have powerful hind legs 0.97
have powerful legs 0.81
has physical part legs 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have hind legs)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part legs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(arctic fox, have hind legs)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part legs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(arctic fox, have hind legs)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have hind legs)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(arctic fox, have hind legs)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have powerful hind legs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(arctic fox, have hind legs)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have powerful hind legs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(arctic fox, have hind legs)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have powerful hind legs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(arctic fox, have hind legs)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(arctic fox, have hind legs)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(arctic fox, have hind legs)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(arctic fox, have hind legs)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have powerful hind legs)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(arctic fox, have hind legs)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(arctic fox, have hind legs)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have powerful legs)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(arctic fox, have hind legs)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have powerful legs)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(arctic fox, have hind legs)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have powerful legs)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(arctic fox, have hind legs)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have powerful legs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(arctic fox, have hind legs)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have hind legs)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have hind legs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(arctic fox, have hind legs)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have hind legs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have hind legs)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part legs)