arctic fox: have powerful hind legs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wildlife
Weight: 0.74
, polar bear
Weight: 0.74
, predator
Weight: 0.73
, species
Weight: 0.71
Siblings red fox
Weight: 0.71
, fox
Weight: 0.39
, snowy owl
Weight: 0.38
, squirrel
Weight: 0.38
, gray fox
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have powerful hind legs 1.00
have hind legs 0.97
have powerful legs 0.90
has physical part legs 0.80
has physical part tail 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have powerful hind legs)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part tail)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have powerful hind legs)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part legs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have powerful hind legs)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tail)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(arctic fox, have powerful hind legs)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part legs)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(arctic fox, have powerful hind legs)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tail)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(arctic fox, have powerful hind legs)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(fox, has physical part tail)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part tail)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(arctic fox, have powerful hind legs)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have powerful hind legs)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(arctic fox, have powerful hind legs)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have hind legs)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(arctic fox, have powerful hind legs)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have hind legs)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(arctic fox, have powerful hind legs)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have hind legs)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(arctic fox, have powerful hind legs)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have hind legs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(arctic fox, have powerful hind legs)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(arctic fox, have powerful hind legs)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(arctic fox, have powerful hind legs)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(arctic fox, have powerful hind legs)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(arctic fox, have powerful hind legs)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have powerful legs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(arctic fox, have powerful hind legs)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(arctic fox, have powerful hind legs)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(arctic fox, have powerful hind legs)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(arctic fox, have powerful hind legs)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(arctic fox, have powerful hind legs)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have powerful legs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(arctic fox, have powerful hind legs)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have powerful legs)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(arctic fox, have powerful hind legs)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have powerful legs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(arctic fox, have powerful hind legs)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have powerful hind legs)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have powerful hind legs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(arctic fox, have powerful hind legs)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have powerful hind legs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have powerful hind legs)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part legs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have powerful hind legs)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have powerful hind legs)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tail)