arctic fox: have thick foot pads

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wildlife
Weight: 0.74
, polar bear
Weight: 0.74
, predator
Weight: 0.73
, species
Weight: 0.71
Siblings red fox
Weight: 0.71
, fox
Weight: 0.39
, snowy owl
Weight: 0.38
, squirrel
Weight: 0.38
, gray fox
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have thick foot pads 1.00
have foot pads 0.96
have back feet 0.79
have big back feet 0.79
have big feet 0.79
has physical part feet 0.77
have thick fur 0.76
have thickly furred footpads 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(polar bear, have big feet)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(polar bear, have thick fur)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(polar bear, have big feet)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have big feet)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have thick fur)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part feet)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(polar bear, have big feet)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(polar bear, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part feet)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fox, has physical part feet)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part feet)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(red fox, have thick fur)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(red fox, have thick fur)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have foot pads)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have foot pads)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have foot pads)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have foot pads)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have back feet)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have thickly furred footpads)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have thickly furred footpads)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have thickly furred footpads)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part feet)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have thickly furred footpads)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have back feet)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part feet)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big back feet)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(arctic fox, has physical part feet)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have back feet)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have big back feet)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big feet)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick fur)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have big feet)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have big back feet)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have thick fur)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have big back feet)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have big feet)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part feet)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have thick fur)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have big feet)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(arctic fox, have thick fur)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have back feet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(polar bear, have big feet)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(polar bear, have thick fur)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part feet)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, have thick fur)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part feet)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(polar bear, have thick fur)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(arctic fox, have thick foot pads)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(polar bear, have big feet)