arctic wolf: be in danger

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wolf
Weight: 0.70
Siblings dingo
Weight: 0.31
, husky
Weight: 0.31
, fenrir
Weight: 0.24

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in danger 1.00
react to danger 0.91
be danger to humans 0.91
escape from danger 0.88
be in danger of extinction 0.86
be at threat 0.85
be at threat of survival 0.80
is dangerous 0.77
be considered dangerous 0.76
fear 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(wolf, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(arctic wolf, be in danger)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(arctic wolf, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(wolf, be in danger)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(arctic wolf, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(wolf, be in danger)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(arctic wolf, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(husky, is dangerous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(arctic wolf, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(dingo, is dangerous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(wolf, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(arctic wolf, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(arctic wolf, be in danger)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(arctic wolf, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(dingo, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(dingo, is dangerous)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(arctic wolf, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(husky, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(husky, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(arctic wolf, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(arctic wolf, be in danger)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(arctic wolf, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(arctic wolf, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(arctic wolf, be in danger)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(arctic wolf, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(arctic wolf, be in danger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(arctic wolf, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(wolf, be in danger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(arctic wolf, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(dingo, is dangerous)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(arctic wolf, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(husky, is dangerous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(arctic wolf, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(wolf, be in danger)