arctic wolf: has physical part ears

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wolf
Weight: 0.70
Siblings dingo
Weight: 0.31
, husky
Weight: 0.31
, fenrir
Weight: 0.24

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part ears 1.00
has physical part eyes 0.89
have big ears 0.89
have small ears 0.87
has physical part teeth 0.85
has physical part paws 0.84
has physical part legs 0.84
has physical part hair 0.83
have pointed ears 0.81
has physical part tails 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(arctic wolf, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(dingo, has physical part ears)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(arctic wolf, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(dingo, have big ears)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(arctic wolf, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(husky, has physical part eyes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(arctic wolf, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(dingo, have pointed ears)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(arctic wolf, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(husky, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(husky, has physical part eyes)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(arctic wolf, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(dingo, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(dingo, has physical part ears)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(arctic wolf, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(dingo, have pointed ears)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(dingo, have pointed ears)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(arctic wolf, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(dingo, have big ears)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(dingo, have big ears)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(arctic wolf, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(arctic wolf, has physical part ears)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(arctic wolf, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(arctic wolf, have small ears)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(arctic wolf, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(arctic wolf, have small ears)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(arctic wolf, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(arctic wolf, have small ears)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(arctic wolf, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(arctic wolf, has physical part hair)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(arctic wolf, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(arctic wolf, has physical part hair)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(arctic wolf, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(arctic wolf, have small ears)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(arctic wolf, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(arctic wolf, has physical part hair)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(arctic wolf, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(arctic wolf, has physical part hair)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(arctic wolf, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(arctic wolf, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(arctic wolf, has physical part ears)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(arctic wolf, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(arctic wolf, has physical part ears)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(arctic wolf, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(dingo, has physical part ears)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(arctic wolf, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(husky, has physical part eyes)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(arctic wolf, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(dingo, have big ears)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(arctic wolf, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(dingo, have pointed ears)