arctic: be in danger

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents region
Weight: 0.64
, environment
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.57
, global warming
Weight: 0.51
Siblings polar bear
Weight: 0.72
, narwhal
Weight: 0.49
, south carolina
Weight: 0.33
, alaska
Weight: 0.32
, north dakota
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in danger 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(environment, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(arctic, be in danger)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(arctic, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(environment, be in danger)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(arctic, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(environment, be in danger)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(arctic, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(narwhal, be in danger)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(arctic, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, be in danger)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(environment, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(arctic, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(arctic, be in danger)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(arctic, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(narwhal, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(narwhal, be in danger)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(arctic, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(polar bear, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(polar bear, be in danger)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(arctic, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(arctic, be in danger)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(arctic, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(arctic, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(arctic, be in danger)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(arctic, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(arctic, be in danger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(arctic, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(environment, be in danger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(arctic, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(narwhal, be in danger)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(arctic, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(polar bear, be in danger)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(arctic, be in danger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(environment, be in danger)