area: be good places live

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents zone
Weight: 0.71
, region
Weight: 0.65
, route
Weight: 0.63
, landmark
Weight: 0.61
Siblings south carolina
Weight: 0.71
, national park
Weight: 0.70
, south dakota
Weight: 0.70
, north carolina
Weight: 0.69
, north dakota
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good places live 1.00
be difficult place live 0.86
stay than areas 0.78
be different from areas 0.77
be in then other areas 0.77
is 51 place 0.77
be good for countries 0.75
be found in land in areas 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(zone, be difficult place live)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(area, be good places live)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(landmark, be good for countries)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(area, be good places live)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(area, be good places live)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(zone, be difficult place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(area, be good places live)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(landmark, be good for countries)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(area, be good places live)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(zone, be difficult place live)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(area, be good places live)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(landmark, be good for countries)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(zone, be difficult place live)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(area, be good places live)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(area, be good places live)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(landmark, be good for countries)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(area, be good places live)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(area, be good places live)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(area, be good places live)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(area, be good places live)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(area, be good places live)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(area, be in then other areas)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(area, be good places live)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(area, be found in land in areas)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(area, be good places live)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(area, be in then other areas)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(area, be good places live)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(area, be found in land in areas)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(area, be good places live)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(area, be in then other areas)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(area, be good places live)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(area, be found in land in areas)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(area, be good places live)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(area, be found in land in areas)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(area, be good places live)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(area, be in then other areas)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(area, be good places live)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(area, be good places live)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(area, be good places live)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(area, be good places live)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(area, be good places live)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(area, be good places live)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(landmark, be good for countries)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(area, be good places live)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(zone, be difficult place live)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(area, be good places live)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(zone, be difficult place live)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(area, be good places live)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(landmark, be good for countries)