argument: be good for relationship

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents straw man
Weight: 0.64
, question
Weight: 0.62
, complaint
Weight: 0.60
, society
Weight: 0.59
Siblings favor
Weight: 0.50
, foo
Weight: 0.44
, answer
Weight: 0.32
, fairness
Weight: 0.31
, problem
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for relationship 1.00
be good for relationships 0.93
be healthy in relationship 0.93
happen in relationship 0.92
be good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(complaint, be good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(argument, be good for relationship)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(argument, be good for relationship)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(complaint, be good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(argument, be good for relationship)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(complaint, be good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(complaint, be good)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(argument, be good for relationship)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(argument, be good for relationship)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(argument, be good for relationship)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(argument, be good for relationship)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(argument, be good for relationship)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(argument, be healthy in relationship)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(argument, be good for relationship)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(argument, be healthy in relationship)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(argument, be good for relationship)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(argument, be healthy in relationship)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(argument, be good for relationship)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(argument, be healthy in relationship)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(argument, be good for relationship)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(argument, be good for relationships)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(argument, be good for relationship)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(argument, be good for relationships)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(argument, be good for relationship)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(argument, be good for relationships)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(argument, be good for relationship)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(argument, happen in relationship)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(argument, be good for relationship)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(argument, be good for relationships)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(argument, be good for relationship)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(argument, happen in relationship)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(argument, be good for relationship)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(argument, happen in relationship)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(argument, be good for relationship)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(argument, happen in relationship)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(argument, be good for relationship)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(argument, be good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(argument, be good for relationship)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(argument, be good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(argument, be good for relationship)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(argument, be good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(argument, be good for relationship)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(argument, be good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(argument, be good for relationship)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(argument, be good for relationship)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(argument, be good for relationship)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(argument, be good for relationship)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(argument, be good for relationship)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(argument, be good for relationship)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(complaint, be good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(argument, be good for relationship)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(complaint, be good)