argument: be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents straw man
Weight: 0.64
, question
Weight: 0.62
, complaint
Weight: 0.60
, society
Weight: 0.59
Siblings favor
Weight: 0.50
, foo
Weight: 0.44
, answer
Weight: 0.32
, fairness
Weight: 0.31
, problem
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries 1.00
be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in countries 0.99
be relevant to minority of citizens in developed countries 0.97
be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens 0.97
be relevant to minority of citizens in countries 0.95
be relevant to minority in developed countries 0.93
be relevant to minority of citizens 0.92
be relevant to minority in countries 0.91
be relevant to minority 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(argument, be relevant to minority of citizens in countries)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(argument, be relevant to minority of citizens in developed countries)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in countries)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(argument, be relevant to minority of citizens in countries)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(argument, be relevant to minority in countries)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(argument, be relevant to minority of citizens)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(argument, be relevant to minority of citizens in developed countries)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in countries)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(argument, be relevant to minority of citizens in developed countries)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(argument, be relevant to minority of citizens in countries)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(argument, be relevant to minority in developed countries)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in countries)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(argument, be relevant to minority in countries)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(argument, be relevant to minority of citizens)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(argument, be relevant to minority)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(argument, be relevant to minority in developed countries)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(argument, be relevant to minority in countries)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(argument, be relevant to minority in developed countries)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(argument, be relevant to minority of citizens)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(argument, be relevant to minority)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(argument, be relevant to minority)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in countries)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(argument, be relevant to minority in developed countries)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(argument, be relevant to minority of citizens in developed countries)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(argument, be relevant to minority of citizens)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(argument, be relevant to minority of citizens in countries)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(argument, be relevant to minority in countries)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(argument, be relevant to minority)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(argument, be relevant to minority of wealthy citizens in developed countries)