arithmetic mean: be considered as best measure of central tendency

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents average
Weight: 0.59
, measure
Weight: 0.51
, number
Weight: 0.50
, type
Weight: 0.47
, value
Weight: 0.40
Siblings geometric mean
Weight: 0.33
, batting average
Weight: 0.32
, ordinal number
Weight: 0.31
, magic number
Weight: 0.31
, irrational number
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered as best measure of central tendency 1.00
be considered as measure of central tendency 0.98
be considered as best measure of tendency 0.97
be considered as measure of tendency 0.95
be considered as best measure 0.87
be considered as measure 0.84
be considered as ideal measure 0.83
be considered best average 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure of central tendency)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(arithmetic mean, be considered as measure of central tendency)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(arithmetic mean, be considered as measure of central tendency)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure of tendency)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure of tendency)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(arithmetic mean, be considered as measure of tendency)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(arithmetic mean, be considered as measure of tendency)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure of tendency)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(arithmetic mean, be considered as measure of central tendency)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(arithmetic mean, be considered as measure of tendency)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(arithmetic mean, be considered as measure)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(arithmetic mean, be considered as measure)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(arithmetic mean, be considered as ideal measure)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(arithmetic mean, be considered as ideal measure)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(arithmetic mean, be considered best average)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(arithmetic mean, be considered as measure of central tendency)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure of tendency)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(arithmetic mean, be considered as measure)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(arithmetic mean, be considered as measure of tendency)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(arithmetic mean, be considered as ideal measure)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(arithmetic mean, be considered as measure)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(arithmetic mean, be considered as ideal measure)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(arithmetic mean, be considered best average)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(arithmetic mean, be considered best average)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(arithmetic mean, be considered best average)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure of central tendency)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure of central tendency) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(arithmetic mean, be considered as best measure of central tendency)