armchair: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.53
, chair
Weight: 0.51
, living room
Weight: 0.47
, dining table
Weight: 0.44
, product
Weight: 0.44
Siblings sofa
Weight: 0.32
, sofa bed
Weight: 0.32
, coffee table
Weight: 0.31
, tablecloth
Weight: 0.31
, pillow case
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
get expensive 0.94
get more expensive 0.90
be in market expensive 0.86
is cheaper 0.85
be much more costly today 0.84
have more expensive than in 1933 today 0.84
be cheaper on flipkart 0.83
be on cheaper 0.83
be sold cheaper 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(product, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(armchair, is expensive)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(chair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(armchair, is expensive)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dining table, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(armchair, is expensive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(armchair, is expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(product, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(armchair, is expensive)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(armchair, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(item, be much more costly today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(armchair, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(product, be cheaper on flipkart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(armchair, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(item, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(dining table, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(chair, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(product, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(product, be cheaper on flipkart)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(item, be much more costly today)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(product, is cheaper)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(product, be cheaper on flipkart)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dining table, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chair, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(product, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(item, is expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(product, is cheaper)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(item, be much more costly today)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(tablecloth, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(sofa, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(coffee table, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(sofa bed, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pillow case, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(product, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(armchair, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(chair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(armchair, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dining table, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(armchair, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(armchair, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(product, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(armchair, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(armchair, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(item, be much more costly today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(armchair, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(product, be cheaper on flipkart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(armchair, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(pillow case, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(pillow case, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(sofa bed, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(sofa bed, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(coffee table, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(coffee table, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(sofa, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(sofa, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(tablecloth, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(tablecloth, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(armchair, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(armchair, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(armchair, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(item, be much more costly today)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(product, be cheaper on flipkart)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(chair, is expensive)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(dining table, is expensive)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(product, is expensive)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(product, is cheaper)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tablecloth, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(sofa, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(sofa bed, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(coffee table, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pillow case, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(chair, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(dining table, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(product, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(item, be much more costly today)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(product, is cheaper)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(product, be cheaper on flipkart)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(armchair, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)