art: be functional in nature

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artifact
Weight: 0.66
, tool
Weight: 0.63
, aspect
Weight: 0.62
, knowledge
Weight: 0.61
Siblings calligraphy
Weight: 0.73
, needlework
Weight: 0.68
, ballet
Weight: 0.68
, cinema
Weight: 0.68
, quilting
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be functional in nature 1.00
be in nature 0.84
is nature 0.83
serve functional for places of worship 0.79
differ from nature 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(art, be functional in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(art, be functional in nature)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(art, be functional in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(art, be in nature)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(art, be functional in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(art, is nature)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(art, be functional in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(art, differ from nature)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(art, be functional in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(art, be in nature)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(art, be functional in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(art, be in nature)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(art, be functional in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(art, is nature)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(art, be functional in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(art, differ from nature)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(art, be functional in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(art, is nature)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(art, be functional in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(art, differ from nature)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(art, be functional in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(art, be in nature)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(art, be functional in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(art, is nature)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(art, be functional in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(art, differ from nature)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(art, be functional in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(art, be functional in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(art, be functional in nature)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(art, be functional in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(art, be functional in nature)