art: was important to romans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artifact
Weight: 0.66
, tool
Weight: 0.63
, aspect
Weight: 0.62
, knowledge
Weight: 0.61
Siblings calligraphy
Weight: 0.73
, needlework
Weight: 0.68
, ballet
Weight: 0.68
, cinema
Weight: 0.68
, quilting
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important to romans 1.00
was used by ancient greece 0.82
was important in rome 0.80
was different from roman art 0.78
was popular in france 0.77
be part of chinese life 0.77
be part of traditional chinese life 0.76
was important in medieval times 0.76
be important for ma 0.76
was created in ancient persia 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(art, was important to romans)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(ballet, was popular in france)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(art, was important to romans)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(ballet, was popular in france)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(ballet, was popular in france)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(art, was important to romans)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(art, was important to romans)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(art, was important to romans)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(art, was important in medieval times)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(art, was important to romans)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(art, was important in medieval times)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(art, was important to romans)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(art, was important in medieval times)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(art, was important to romans)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(art, was important in medieval times)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(art, was important to romans)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(art, was important to romans)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(art, was important to romans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(art, was important to romans)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(art, was important to romans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(art, was important to romans)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(ballet, was popular in france)