arthropod: be successful on land

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents invertebrate
Weight: 0.67
, organism
Weight: 0.58
, animal
Weight: 0.55
, parasite
Weight: 0.49
Siblings centipede
Weight: 0.68
, arachnid
Weight: 0.57
, insect
Weight: 0.37
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be successful on land 1.00
is successful 0.86
is most successful 0.82
be said successful 0.81
most successful animals on earth 0.80
be considered very successful 0.79
be successful group of animals 0.79
were first animals live on land 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(invertebrate, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(arthropod, be successful on land)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(arthropod, be successful on land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(invertebrate, is successful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, be successful on land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(invertebrate, is successful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, be successful on land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(insect, is successful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(invertebrate, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(arthropod, be successful on land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(arthropod, be successful on land)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(arthropod, be successful on land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(insect, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(insect, is successful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(arthropod, be successful on land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(arthropod, be successful on land)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(arthropod, be successful on land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(arthropod, is successful)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(arthropod, be successful on land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(arthropod, is successful)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(arthropod, be successful on land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(arthropod, is most successful)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(arthropod, be successful on land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(arthropod, is most successful)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(arthropod, be successful on land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(arthropod, is successful)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(arthropod, be successful on land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(arthropod, most successful animals on earth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(arthropod, be successful on land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(arthropod, is most successful)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(arthropod, be successful on land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(arthropod, be successful group of animals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(arthropod, be successful on land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(arthropod, were first animals live on land)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(arthropod, be successful on land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(arthropod, most successful animals on earth)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(arthropod, be successful on land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(arthropod, were first animals live on land)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(arthropod, be successful on land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(arthropod, be successful group of animals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(arthropod, be successful on land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, is most successful)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(arthropod, be successful on land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(arthropod, most successful animals on earth)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(arthropod, be successful on land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(arthropod, were first animals live on land)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(arthropod, be successful on land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(arthropod, be successful group of animals)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(arthropod, be successful on land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, were first animals live on land)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(arthropod, be successful on land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, is successful)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(arthropod, be successful on land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, most successful animals on earth)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(arthropod, be successful on land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, be successful group of animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(arthropod, be successful on land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(arthropod, be successful on land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, be successful on land)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(arthropod, be successful on land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(arthropod, be successful on land)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, be successful on land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(invertebrate, is successful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, be successful on land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(insect, is successful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(arthropod, be successful on land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(invertebrate, is successful)