article in magazine: be used to review debate

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to review debate 1.00
be used to review book 0.84
be used to review film 0.82
be used to review restaurant 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(article in magazine, be used to review debate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(article in magazine, be used to review debate)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(article in magazine, be used to review debate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(article in magazine, be used to review book)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(article in magazine, be used to review debate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(article in magazine, be used to review film)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(article in magazine, be used to review debate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(article in magazine, be used to review film)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(article in magazine, be used to review debate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(article in magazine, be used to review restaurant)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(article in magazine, be used to review debate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(article in magazine, be used to review restaurant)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(article in magazine, be used to review debate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(article in magazine, be used to review book)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(article in magazine, be used to review debate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(article in magazine, be used to review film)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(article in magazine, be used to review debate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(article in magazine, be used to review restaurant)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(article in magazine, be used to review debate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(article in magazine, be used to review film)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(article in magazine, be used to review debate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(article in magazine, be used to review book)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(article in magazine, be used to review debate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(article in magazine, be used to review restaurant)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(article in magazine, be used to review debate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(article in magazine, be used to review book)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(article in magazine, be used to review debate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(article in magazine, be used to review debate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(article in magazine, be used to review debate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(article in magazine, be used to review debate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(article in magazine, be used to review debate)