artifact: be important to archaeologists

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents object
Weight: 0.71
, item
Weight: 0.68
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, tool
Weight: 0.57
Siblings artwork
Weight: 0.68
, instrument
Weight: 0.68
, photograph
Weight: 0.67
, musical instrument
Weight: 0.66
, art
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to archaeologists 1.00
help archaeologists 0.98
help archeologist 0.83
be important to historians 0.80
was useful to historians 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(artifact, be important to archaeologists)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(photograph, be important to historians)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(artifact, be important to archaeologists)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(photograph, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(photograph, be important to historians)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(artifact, be important to archaeologists)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(artifact, be important to archaeologists)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(artifact, be important to archaeologists)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(artifact, help archaeologists)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(artifact, be important to archaeologists)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(artifact, help archaeologists)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(artifact, be important to archaeologists)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(artifact, help archaeologists)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(artifact, be important to archaeologists)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(artifact, help archeologist)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(artifact, be important to archaeologists)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(artifact, help archeologist)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(artifact, be important to archaeologists)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(artifact, help archaeologists)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(artifact, be important to archaeologists)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(artifact, be important to historians)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(artifact, be important to archaeologists)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(artifact, be important to historians)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(artifact, be important to archaeologists)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(artifact, was useful to historians)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(artifact, be important to archaeologists)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(artifact, was useful to historians)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(artifact, be important to archaeologists)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(artifact, be important to historians)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(artifact, be important to archaeologists)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(artifact, help archeologist)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(artifact, be important to archaeologists)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(artifact, was useful to historians)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(artifact, be important to archaeologists)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(artifact, help archeologist)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(artifact, be important to archaeologists)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(artifact, be important to historians)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(artifact, be important to archaeologists)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(artifact, was useful to historians)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(artifact, be important to archaeologists)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(artifact, be important to archaeologists)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(artifact, be important to archaeologists)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(artifact, be important to archaeologists)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(artifact, be important to archaeologists)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(artifact, be important to archaeologists)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(photograph, be important to historians)