artifact: was useful to historians

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents object
Weight: 0.71
, item
Weight: 0.68
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, tool
Weight: 0.57
Siblings artwork
Weight: 0.68
, instrument
Weight: 0.68
, photograph
Weight: 0.67
, musical instrument
Weight: 0.66
, art
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
was useful to historians 1.00
be important to historians 0.96
be important to archaeologists 0.78
be useful to people 0.78
help archaeologists 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(artifact, was useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(photograph, be important to historians)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(artifact, was useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(photograph, be important to historians)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(photograph, be important to historians)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(artifact, was useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(artifact, was useful to historians)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(artifact, was useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(artifact, be important to historians)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(artifact, was useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(artifact, be important to historians)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(artifact, was useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(artifact, be important to historians)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(artifact, was useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(artifact, be important to historians)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(artifact, was useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(artifact, be useful to people)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(artifact, was useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(artifact, be useful to people)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(artifact, was useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(artifact, be useful to people)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(artifact, was useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(artifact, be important to archaeologists)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(artifact, was useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(artifact, help archaeologists)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(artifact, was useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(artifact, be important to archaeologists)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(artifact, was useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(artifact, be important to archaeologists)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(artifact, was useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(artifact, help archaeologists)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(artifact, was useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(artifact, be important to archaeologists)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(artifact, was useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(artifact, help archaeologists)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(artifact, was useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(artifact, help archaeologists)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(artifact, was useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(artifact, be useful to people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(artifact, was useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(artifact, was useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(artifact, was useful to historians)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(artifact, was useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(artifact, was useful to historians)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(artifact, was useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(photograph, be important to historians)