artificial intelligence: differ regarding problem solving

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents technology
Weight: 0.68
, computer science
Weight: 0.65
, development
Weight: 0.64
, discipline
Weight: 0.63
, intelligence
Weight: 0.62
Siblings military intelligence
Weight: 0.39
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.34
, fiber optics
Weight: 0.33
, logic
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
differ regarding problem solving 1.00
differ from humans 0.77
has state problem 0.75
be differ from computer system 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(discipline, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(artificial intelligence, differ regarding problem solving)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(technology, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(artificial intelligence, differ regarding problem solving)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(artificial intelligence, differ regarding problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(technology, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(artificial intelligence, differ regarding problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(discipline, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(artificial intelligence, differ regarding problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(technology, has state problem)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(artificial intelligence, differ regarding problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(discipline, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(artificial intelligence, differ regarding problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(artificial intelligence, differ regarding problem solving)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(technology, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(artificial intelligence, differ regarding problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(artificial intelligence, differ regarding problem solving)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(artificial intelligence, differ regarding problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(artificial intelligence, differ regarding problem solving)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(artificial intelligence, differ regarding problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(artificial intelligence, differ from humans)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(artificial intelligence, differ regarding problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(artificial intelligence, be differ from computer system)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(artificial intelligence, differ regarding problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(artificial intelligence, be differ from computer system)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(artificial intelligence, differ regarding problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(artificial intelligence, be differ from computer system)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(artificial intelligence, differ regarding problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(artificial intelligence, differ from humans)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(artificial intelligence, differ regarding problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(artificial intelligence, be differ from computer system)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(artificial intelligence, differ regarding problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(artificial intelligence, has state problem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(artificial intelligence, differ regarding problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(artificial intelligence, has state problem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(artificial intelligence, differ regarding problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(artificial intelligence, has state problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(artificial intelligence, differ regarding problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(artificial intelligence, has state problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(artificial intelligence, differ regarding problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(artificial intelligence, differ from humans)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(artificial intelligence, differ regarding problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(artificial intelligence, differ from humans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(artificial intelligence, differ regarding problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(artificial intelligence, differ regarding problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(artificial intelligence, differ regarding problem solving)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(artificial intelligence, differ regarding problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(artificial intelligence, differ regarding problem solving)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(artificial intelligence, differ regarding problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(technology, has state problem)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(artificial intelligence, differ regarding problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(discipline, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(artificial intelligence, differ regarding problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(technology, has state problem)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(artificial intelligence, differ regarding problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(discipline, has state problem)