artificial turf: get hot

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surface
Weight: 0.68
, material
Weight: 0.59
, construction
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.55
Siblings asphalt
Weight: 0.34
, sand
Weight: 0.33
, ground
Weight: 0.33
, clay
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
get hot 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(artificial turf, get hot)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(sand, get hot)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(artificial turf, get hot)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(asphalt, get hot)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(artificial turf, get hot)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(sand, get hot)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(sand, get hot)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(artificial turf, get hot)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(asphalt, get hot)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(asphalt, get hot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(artificial turf, get hot)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(artificial turf, get hot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(artificial turf, get hot)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(artificial turf, get hot)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(artificial turf, get hot)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(artificial turf, get hot)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(artificial turf, get hot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(artificial turf, get hot)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(sand, get hot)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(artificial turf, get hot)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(asphalt, get hot)