artist: be at gallery open

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents resident
Weight: 0.60
, man
Weight: 0.60
, craftsman
Weight: 0.59
, folk
Weight: 0.59
Siblings dancer
Weight: 0.73
, painter
Weight: 0.72
, pianist
Weight: 0.72
, exhibit
Weight: 0.71
, composer
Weight: 0.71

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at gallery open 1.00
be at museum 0.79
open his own shop 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(artist, be at gallery open)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(exhibit, be at museum)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(artist, be at gallery open)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(exhibit, be at museum)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(exhibit, be at museum)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(artist, be at gallery open)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(artist, be at gallery open)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(artist, be at gallery open)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(artist, be at gallery open)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(artist, be at gallery open)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(artist, be at gallery open)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(artist, be at gallery open)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(artist, be at gallery open)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(exhibit, be at museum)