asbestos: be environmental problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents substance
Weight: 0.68
, chemical
Weight: 0.68
, hazard
Weight: 0.66
, mineral
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.60
Siblings benzene
Weight: 0.36
, arsenic
Weight: 0.35
, manganese
Weight: 0.35
, sulfuric acid
Weight: 0.35
, sulfur dioxide
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be environmental problem 1.00
is environmental issue 0.93
is environmental 0.92
be environmental 0.92
has state problem 0.79
is health hazard 0.76
be considered health hazard 0.76
was health hazard 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(hazard, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(asbestos, be environmental problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(asbestos, be environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(hazard, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(asbestos, be environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hazard, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(asbestos, be environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(arsenic, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(hazard, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(asbestos, be environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(asbestos, be environmental problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(asbestos, be environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(arsenic, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(arsenic, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(asbestos, be environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(asbestos, be environmental problem)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(asbestos, be environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(asbestos, is environmental issue)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(asbestos, be environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(asbestos, is environmental issue)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(asbestos, be environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(asbestos, is environmental)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(asbestos, be environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(asbestos, is environmental issue)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(asbestos, be environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(asbestos, is environmental)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(asbestos, be environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(asbestos, is environmental issue)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(asbestos, be environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(asbestos, be environmental)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(asbestos, be environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(asbestos, be environmental)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(asbestos, be environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(asbestos, is environmental)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(asbestos, be environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(asbestos, be environmental)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(asbestos, be environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(asbestos, be considered health hazard)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(asbestos, be environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(asbestos, is health hazard)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(asbestos, be environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(asbestos, was health hazard)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(asbestos, be environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(asbestos, be environmental)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(asbestos, be environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(asbestos, has state problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(asbestos, be environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(asbestos, be considered health hazard)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(asbestos, be environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(asbestos, is health hazard)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(asbestos, be environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(asbestos, was health hazard)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(asbestos, be environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(asbestos, has state problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(asbestos, be environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(asbestos, has state problem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(asbestos, be environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(asbestos, be considered health hazard)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(asbestos, be environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(asbestos, has state problem)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(asbestos, be environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(asbestos, is health hazard)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(asbestos, be environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(asbestos, was health hazard)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(asbestos, be environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(asbestos, is environmental)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(asbestos, be environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(asbestos, was health hazard)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(asbestos, be environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(asbestos, is health hazard)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(asbestos, be environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(asbestos, be considered health hazard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(asbestos, be environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(asbestos, be environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(asbestos, be environmental problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(asbestos, be environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(asbestos, be environmental problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(asbestos, be environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hazard, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(asbestos, be environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(arsenic, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(asbestos, be environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hazard, has state problem)