assault: be under-reported at universities

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents felony
Weight: 0.63
, attack
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.62
, charge
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.61
Siblings sexual assault
Weight: 0.70
, rape
Weight: 0.36
, robbery
Weight: 0.35
, first degree murder
Weight: 0.35
, manslaughter
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be under-reported at universities 1.00
be on college campuses 0.85
be on college campuses problem 0.83
be problem on college campuses 0.83
be common on college campuses 0.83
happen on college campuses 0.83
be prevalent on college campuses 0.81
be for academic publications 0.77
affect students at cmuq 0.76
be for academic publications justified 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, be under-reported at universities)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, be on college campuses)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, happen on college campuses)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, be on college campuses problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, be problem on college campuses)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, be common on college campuses)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, be prevalent on college campuses)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(sexual assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, be under-reported at universities)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(sexual assault, be on college campuses)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, be on college campuses)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(sexual assault, happen on college campuses)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, happen on college campuses)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(sexual assault, be on college campuses problem)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, be on college campuses problem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(sexual assault, be common on college campuses)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, be common on college campuses)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(sexual assault, be problem on college campuses)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, be problem on college campuses)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(sexual assault, be prevalent on college campuses)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, be prevalent on college campuses)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(assault, be under-reported at universities)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(assault, be on college campuses)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(assault, be on college campuses)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(assault, be on college campuses)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(assault, happen on college campuses)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(assault, happen on college campuses)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(assault, be on college campuses)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(assault, happen on college campuses)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(assault, be prevalent on college campuses)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(assault, be prevalent on college campuses)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(assault, happen on college campuses)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(assault, be prevalent on college campuses)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(assault, be prevalent on college campuses)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(assault, be on college campuses problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(assault, be on college campuses problem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(assault, be on college campuses problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(assault, be problem on college campuses)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(assault, be on college campuses problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(assault, be common on college campuses)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(assault, be problem on college campuses)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(assault, be common on college campuses)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(assault, be problem on college campuses)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(assault, be common on college campuses)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(assault, be problem on college campuses)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(assault, be common on college campuses)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(assault, be under-reported at universities)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(assault, be under-reported at universities)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(sexual assault, be under-reported at universities)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(sexual assault, be on college campuses)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(sexual assault, happen on college campuses)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(sexual assault, be on college campuses problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(sexual assault, be common on college campuses)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(sexual assault, be problem on college campuses)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(assault, be under-reported at universities)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(sexual assault, be prevalent on college campuses)