assault: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents felony
Weight: 0.63
, attack
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.62
, charge
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.61
Siblings sexual assault
Weight: 0.70
, rape
Weight: 0.36
, robbery
Weight: 0.35
, first degree murder
Weight: 0.35
, manslaughter
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
has quality wrong 0.85
has quality worse 0.84
CAN good 0.81
has quality news 0.79
has quality spot 0.79
has quality evil 0.78
has quality question 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(attack, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(assault, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(assault, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(felony, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(assault, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(attack, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(assault, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(attack, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(assault, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(felony, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(assault, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(attack, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(felony, has quality question)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(felony, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(attack, has quality spot)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(attack, has quality better)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(attack, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(felony, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality better)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality spot)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(felony, has quality question)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(rape, has quality wrong)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has quality news)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(attack, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(assault, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(attack, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(assault, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(felony, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(assault, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(attack, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(assault, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(attack, has quality spot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(assault, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(felony, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(assault, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(robbery, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(robbery, has quality news)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(robbery, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(robbery, has quality worse)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(rape, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(rape, has quality wrong)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(assault, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(assault, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality wrong)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(assault, has quality wrong)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(assault, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(assault, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(assault, has quality wrong)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(assault, has quality wrong)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(assault, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(attack, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(felony, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(attack, has quality better)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(attack, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(attack, has quality spot)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(felony, has quality question)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(robbery, has quality worse)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(rape, has quality wrong)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(robbery, has quality news)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(attack, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(felony, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(felony, has quality question)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(attack, has quality better)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(attack, has quality spot)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(assault, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(attack, has quality bad)