assault: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents felony
Weight: 0.63
, attack
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.62
, charge
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.61
Siblings sexual assault
Weight: 0.70
, rape
Weight: 0.36
, robbery
Weight: 0.35
, first degree murder
Weight: 0.35
, manslaughter
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
is social problem 0.85
be problem in military 0.83
be such problem in america 0.78
is issue 0.78
be issue 0.77
has state end 0.76
be such problem in india 0.76
be such big problem in india 0.76
has state condition 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(assault, has state problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(event, has state end)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(assault, has state problem)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(issue, be such problem in america)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(assault, has state problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(issue, be such problem in america)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(event, has state end)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(event, has state end)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(issue, be such problem in america)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(rape, be such big problem in india)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state condition)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(rape, be such problem in india)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, be problem in military)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(robbery, is social problem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(robbery, is issue)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is issue)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(assault, has state problem)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(event, has state end)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(assault, has state problem)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(issue, be such problem in america)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(assault, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(robbery, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(robbery, has state problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(sexual assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, has state problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(robbery, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(robbery, is social problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, is issue)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(sexual assault, be problem in military)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, be problem in military)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(robbery, is issue)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(robbery, is issue)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, has state condition)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(rape, be such problem in india)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(rape, be such problem in india)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(rape, be such big problem in india)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(rape, be such big problem in india)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(assault, has state problem)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(assault, is issue)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(assault, be problem in military)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(assault, is issue)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(assault, is issue)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(assault, has state condition)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(assault, has state condition)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(assault, has state condition)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(assault, be problem in military)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(assault, be problem in military)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(assault, be problem in military)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(assault, has state condition)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(assault, is issue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(assault, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(assault, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(issue, be such problem in america)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(event, has state end)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(robbery, is social problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(robbery, is issue)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(sexual assault, is issue)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(robbery, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(sexual assault, has state condition)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sexual assault, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sexual assault, be problem in military)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(rape, be such big problem in india)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(rape, be such problem in india)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(issue, be such problem in america)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(event, has state end)