asset: be appropriated during divorce

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents loan
Weight: 0.68
, option
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.60
, customer
Weight: 0.59
Siblings experience
Weight: 0.64
, talent
Weight: 0.64
, good will
Weight: 0.57
, domain
Weight: 0.55
, farmland
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be appropriated during divorce 1.00
be divided in divorce 0.80
be split in divorce 0.78
be split up in divorce 0.78
be split after divorce 0.78
be split in divorce in virginia 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(asset, be appropriated during divorce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(asset, be appropriated during divorce)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(asset, be appropriated during divorce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(asset, be divided in divorce)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(asset, be appropriated during divorce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(asset, be split in divorce)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(asset, be appropriated during divorce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(asset, be split up in divorce)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(asset, be appropriated during divorce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(asset, be split after divorce)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(asset, be appropriated during divorce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(asset, be split in divorce in virginia)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(asset, be appropriated during divorce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(asset, be divided in divorce)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(asset, be appropriated during divorce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(asset, be divided in divorce)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(asset, be appropriated during divorce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(asset, be split in divorce)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(asset, be appropriated during divorce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(asset, be split up in divorce)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(asset, be appropriated during divorce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(asset, be split after divorce)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(asset, be appropriated during divorce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(asset, be split in divorce in virginia)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(asset, be appropriated during divorce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(asset, be divided in divorce)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(asset, be appropriated during divorce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(asset, be split in divorce in virginia)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(asset, be appropriated during divorce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(asset, be split after divorce)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(asset, be appropriated during divorce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(asset, be split up in divorce)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(asset, be appropriated during divorce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(asset, be split in divorce)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(asset, be appropriated during divorce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(asset, be split in divorce in virginia)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(asset, be appropriated during divorce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(asset, be split in divorce)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(asset, be appropriated during divorce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(asset, be split after divorce)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(asset, be appropriated during divorce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(asset, be split up in divorce)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(asset, be appropriated during divorce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(asset, be appropriated during divorce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(asset, be appropriated during divorce)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(asset, be appropriated during divorce) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(asset, be appropriated during divorce)