asset: be hard to value

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents loan
Weight: 0.68
, option
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.60
, customer
Weight: 0.59
Siblings experience
Weight: 0.64
, talent
Weight: 0.64
, good will
Weight: 0.57
, domain
Weight: 0.55
, farmland
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be hard to value 1.00
be to value important 0.91
be to value 0.91
is value 0.91
have time value 0.91
want value 0.90
lose value 0.86
want value for money 0.86
is hard 0.84
be perceived value important 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(customer, be perceived value important)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(asset, be hard to value)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(loan, is hard)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(asset, be hard to value)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(loan, be to value important)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(asset, be hard to value)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(option, lose value)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(asset, be hard to value)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(loan, be to value)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(asset, be hard to value)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(option, have time value)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(asset, be hard to value)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(loan, be to value)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(option, have time value)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(loan, be to value important)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(option, lose value)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(loan, is hard)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(customer, be perceived value important)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(option, lose value)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(option, have time value)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(customer, be perceived value important)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(loan, is hard)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(loan, be to value important)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(loan, be to value)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(experience, is hard)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(customer, be perceived value important)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(asset, be hard to value)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(loan, be to value important)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(asset, be hard to value)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(loan, be to value)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(asset, be hard to value)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(option, have time value)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(asset, be hard to value)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(loan, is hard)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(asset, be hard to value)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(option, lose value)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(asset, be hard to value)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(experience, is hard)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(experience, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(asset, be hard to value)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(asset, lose value)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(asset, lose value)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(asset, lose value)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(asset, lose value)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(asset, be hard to value)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(asset, be hard to value)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(loan, be to value)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(loan, be to value important)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(option, have time value)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(option, lose value)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(loan, is hard)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(customer, be perceived value important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(experience, is hard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(loan, be to value)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(loan, be to value important)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(option, have time value)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(option, lose value)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(loan, is hard)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(asset, be hard to value)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(customer, be perceived value important)