asset: be left in game

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents loan
Weight: 0.68
, option
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.60
, customer
Weight: 0.59
Siblings experience
Weight: 0.64
, talent
Weight: 0.64
, good will
Weight: 0.57
, domain
Weight: 0.55
, farmland
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be left in game 1.00
be left in final game 0.93
be in game work 0.88
be on left side 0.84
be in games 0.83
be for games 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(asset, be left in game)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(experience, be in game work)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(asset, be left in game)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(experience, be for games)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(asset, be left in game)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(experience, be in game work)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(experience, be in game work)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(asset, be left in game)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(experience, be for games)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(experience, be for games)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(asset, be left in game)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(asset, be left in game)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(asset, be left in game)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(asset, be on left side)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(asset, be left in game)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(asset, be on left side)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(asset, be left in game)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(asset, be on left side)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(asset, be left in game)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(asset, be left in final game)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(asset, be left in game)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(asset, be on left side)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(asset, be left in game)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(asset, be left in final game)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(asset, be left in game)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(asset, be in games)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(asset, be left in game)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(asset, be left in final game)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(asset, be left in game)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(asset, be left in final game)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(asset, be left in game)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(asset, be in games)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(asset, be left in game)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(asset, be in games)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(asset, be left in game)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(asset, be in games)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(asset, be left in game)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(asset, be left in game)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(asset, be left in game)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(asset, be left in game)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(asset, be left in game)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(asset, be left in game)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(experience, be in game work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(asset, be left in game)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(experience, be for games)