asset: be listed in order of liquidity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents loan
Weight: 0.68
, option
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.60
, customer
Weight: 0.59
Siblings experience
Weight: 0.64
, talent
Weight: 0.64
, good will
Weight: 0.57
, domain
Weight: 0.55
, farmland
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be listed in order of liquidity 1.00
be listed in order 0.83
be listed before assets 0.81
be listed before fixed assets 0.80
be considered assets to banks 0.76
have for banks assets 0.75
is illiquid 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(loan, is illiquid)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(loan, be considered assets to banks)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(loan, have for banks assets)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(loan, be considered assets to banks)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(loan, have for banks assets)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(loan, is illiquid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(loan, is illiquid)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(loan, be considered assets to banks)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(loan, have for banks assets)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(loan, is illiquid)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(loan, be considered assets to banks)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(loan, have for banks assets)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(asset, be listed in order)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(asset, be listed in order)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(asset, be listed before assets)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(asset, be listed before fixed assets)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(asset, be listed in order)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(asset, be listed before assets)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(asset, be listed before fixed assets)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(asset, be listed before assets)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(asset, be listed before fixed assets)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(asset, be listed in order)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(asset, be listed before fixed assets)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(asset, be listed before assets)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(loan, have for banks assets)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(loan, be considered assets to banks)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(loan, is illiquid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(loan, be considered assets to banks)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(loan, have for banks assets)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(asset, be listed in order of liquidity)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(loan, is illiquid)