asset: be recorded at cost

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents loan
Weight: 0.68
, option
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.60
, customer
Weight: 0.59
Siblings experience
Weight: 0.64
, talent
Weight: 0.64
, good will
Weight: 0.57
, domain
Weight: 0.55
, farmland
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be recorded at cost 1.00
be recorded at historical cost 0.91
cost more 0.80
cost amount year 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(asset, be recorded at cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(domain, cost more)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(asset, be recorded at cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(domain, cost amount year)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(asset, be recorded at cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(domain, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(domain, cost more)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(asset, be recorded at cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(domain, cost amount year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(domain, cost amount year)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(asset, be recorded at cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(asset, be recorded at cost)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(asset, be recorded at cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(asset, be recorded at historical cost)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(asset, be recorded at cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(asset, be recorded at historical cost)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(asset, be recorded at cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(asset, be recorded at historical cost)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(asset, be recorded at cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(asset, be recorded at historical cost)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(asset, be recorded at cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(asset, be recorded at cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(asset, be recorded at cost)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(asset, be recorded at cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(asset, be recorded at cost)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(asset, be recorded at cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(domain, cost more)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(asset, be recorded at cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(domain, cost amount year)