asset: be revalued at time

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents loan
Weight: 0.68
, option
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.60
, customer
Weight: 0.59
Siblings experience
Weight: 0.64
, talent
Weight: 0.64
, good will
Weight: 0.57
, domain
Weight: 0.55
, farmland
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be revalued at time 1.00
is revalued 0.98
be revalued at time of admission 0.92
is revalued on admission 0.91
be revalued at time of admission of partner 0.90
is revalued on admission of partner 0.89
is depreciated 0.79
depreciate in value 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(asset, be revalued at time)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(asset, be revalued at time)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(asset, be revalued at time)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(asset, is revalued)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(asset, be revalued at time)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(asset, is revalued)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(asset, be revalued at time)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(asset, be revalued at time of admission)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(asset, be revalued at time)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(asset, is revalued on admission)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(asset, be revalued at time)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(asset, be revalued at time of admission of partner)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(asset, be revalued at time)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(asset, is revalued on admission of partner)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(asset, be revalued at time)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(asset, be revalued at time of admission)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(asset, be revalued at time)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(asset, is revalued on admission)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(asset, be revalued at time)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(asset, be revalued at time of admission of partner)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(asset, be revalued at time)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(asset, is revalued)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(asset, be revalued at time)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(asset, is revalued on admission of partner)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(asset, be revalued at time)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(asset, is revalued)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(asset, be revalued at time)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(asset, is depreciated)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(asset, be revalued at time)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(asset, depreciate in value)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(asset, be revalued at time)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(asset, be revalued at time of admission)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(asset, be revalued at time)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(asset, be revalued at time of admission of partner)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(asset, be revalued at time)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(asset, is revalued on admission)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(asset, be revalued at time)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(asset, is revalued on admission of partner)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(asset, be revalued at time)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(asset, is depreciated)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(asset, be revalued at time)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(asset, depreciate in value)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(asset, be revalued at time)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(asset, is revalued on admission)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(asset, be revalued at time)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(asset, is revalued on admission of partner)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(asset, be revalued at time)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(asset, be revalued at time of admission)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(asset, be revalued at time)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(asset, depreciate in value)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(asset, be revalued at time)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(asset, be revalued at time of admission of partner)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(asset, be revalued at time)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(asset, is depreciated)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(asset, be revalued at time)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(asset, is depreciated)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(asset, be revalued at time)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(asset, depreciate in value)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(asset, be revalued at time)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(asset, be revalued at time)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(asset, be revalued at time)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(asset, be revalued at time)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(asset, be revalued at time)