asset: be revalued at time of admission

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents loan
Weight: 0.68
, option
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.60
, customer
Weight: 0.59
Siblings experience
Weight: 0.64
, talent
Weight: 0.64
, good will
Weight: 0.57
, domain
Weight: 0.55
, farmland
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be revalued at time of admission 1.00
is revalued on admission 0.99
be revalued at time of admission of partner 0.97
is revalued on admission of partner 0.96
be revalued at time 0.92
is revalued 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(asset, be revalued at time of admission) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(asset, be revalued at time of admission)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(asset, be revalued at time of admission) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(asset, is revalued on admission)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(asset, be revalued at time of admission) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(asset, be revalued at time of admission of partner)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(asset, be revalued at time of admission) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(asset, is revalued on admission of partner)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(asset, be revalued at time of admission) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(asset, is revalued on admission)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(asset, be revalued at time of admission) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(asset, be revalued at time of admission of partner)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(asset, be revalued at time of admission) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(asset, is revalued on admission of partner)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(asset, be revalued at time of admission) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(asset, be revalued at time)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(asset, be revalued at time of admission) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(asset, is revalued)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(asset, be revalued at time of admission) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(asset, be revalued at time)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(asset, be revalued at time of admission) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(asset, is revalued on admission)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(asset, be revalued at time of admission) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(asset, be revalued at time of admission of partner)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(asset, be revalued at time of admission) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(asset, is revalued)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(asset, be revalued at time of admission) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(asset, is revalued on admission of partner)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(asset, be revalued at time of admission) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(asset, be revalued at time)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(asset, be revalued at time of admission) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(asset, is revalued)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(asset, be revalued at time of admission) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(asset, is revalued on admission of partner)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(asset, be revalued at time of admission) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(asset, is revalued on admission)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(asset, be revalued at time of admission) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(asset, be revalued at time of admission of partner)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(asset, be revalued at time of admission) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(asset, be revalued at time)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(asset, be revalued at time of admission) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(asset, is revalued)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(asset, be revalued at time of admission) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(asset, be revalued at time of admission) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(asset, be revalued at time of admission)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(asset, be revalued at time of admission) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(asset, be revalued at time of admission)