asset: be under management important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents loan
Weight: 0.68
, option
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.60
, customer
Weight: 0.59
Siblings experience
Weight: 0.64
, talent
Weight: 0.64
, good will
Weight: 0.57
, domain
Weight: 0.55
, farmland
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be under management important 1.00
be under management 0.97
is management 0.90
management 0.89
be important for business 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(asset, be under management important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(domain, be important for business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(asset, be under management important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(talent, is management)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(asset, be under management important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(talent, is management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(talent, is management)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(asset, be under management important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(domain, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(domain, be important for business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(asset, be under management important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(asset, be under management important)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(asset, be under management important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(asset, be under management)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(asset, be under management important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(asset, be under management)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(asset, be under management important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(asset, management)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(asset, be under management important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(asset, be under management)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(asset, be under management important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(asset, be under management)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(asset, be under management important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(asset, management)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(asset, be under management important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(asset, management)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(asset, be under management important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(asset, management)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(asset, be under management important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(asset, be under management important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(asset, be under management important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(asset, be under management important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(asset, be under management important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(asset, be under management important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(talent, is management)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(asset, be under management important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(domain, be important for business)