asset: depreciate in value

Related concepts

Parents	loan Weight: 0.68 , option Weight: 0.61 , subject Weight: 0.60 , customer Weight: 0.59
Siblings	experience Weight: 0.64 , talent Weight: 0.64 , good will Weight: 0.57 , domain Weight: 0.55 , farmland Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property	Similarity
depreciate in value	1.00
is depreciated	0.84
lose value	0.83
be to value	0.83
is value	0.83
have time value	0.81
want value	0.81
be to value important	0.81
want value for money	0.78
be perceived value	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(customer, be perceived value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(asset, depreciate in value)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(option, lose value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(asset, depreciate in value)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(loan, be to value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(asset, depreciate in value)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.33

Plausible(loan, be to value important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(asset, depreciate in value)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(option, have time value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(asset, depreciate in value)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(asset, depreciate in value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(loan, be to value)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(asset, depreciate in value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(option, have time value)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(asset, depreciate in value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(option, lose value)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(asset, depreciate in value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(loan, be to value important)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(asset, depreciate in value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(customer, be perceived value)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(asset, depreciate in value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(option, lose value)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(asset, depreciate in value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(customer, be perceived value)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(asset, depreciate in value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(option, have time value)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(asset, depreciate in value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(loan, be to value important)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(asset, depreciate in value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(loan, be to value)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.35

Plausible(option, lose value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(asset, depreciate in value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(asset, depreciate in value)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(loan, be to value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(asset, depreciate in value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(asset, depreciate in value)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(option, have time value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(asset, depreciate in value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(asset, depreciate in value)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.33

Plausible(loan, be to value important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(asset, depreciate in value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(asset, depreciate in value)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(customer, be perceived value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(asset, depreciate in value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(asset, depreciate in value)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(asset, depreciate in value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(asset, depreciate in value)

Similarity expansion

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(asset, depreciate in value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(asset, lose value)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(asset, depreciate in value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(asset, is depreciated)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(asset, depreciate in value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(asset, lose value)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(asset, depreciate in value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(asset, is depreciated)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(asset, depreciate in value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(asset, lose value)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(asset, depreciate in value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Plausible(asset, is depreciated)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.26

Typical(asset, depreciate in value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(asset, is depreciated)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.26

Typical(asset, depreciate in value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(asset, lose value)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(asset, depreciate in value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(asset, depreciate in value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(asset, depreciate in value)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(asset, depreciate in value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(asset, depreciate in value)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(asset, depreciate in value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(loan, be to value)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(asset, depreciate in value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(loan, be to value important)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(asset, depreciate in value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(option, have time value)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(asset, depreciate in value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(option, lose value)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(asset, depreciate in value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(customer, be perceived value)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.26

Typical(asset, depreciate in value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(loan, be to value)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.26

Typical(asset, depreciate in value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(loan, be to value important)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.26

Typical(asset, depreciate in value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(option, have time value)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.26

Typical(asset, depreciate in value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(option, lose value)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.26

Typical(asset, depreciate in value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(customer, be perceived value)