assistant: be in high demand

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents staff
Weight: 0.66
, student
Weight: 0.63
, official
Weight: 0.63
, position
Weight: 0.60
Siblings secretary
Weight: 0.66
, stylist
Weight: 0.46
, intern
Weight: 0.36
, department
Weight: 0.34
, coach
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in high demand 1.00
be in demand 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(assistant, be in high demand)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(assistant, be in high demand)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(assistant, be in high demand)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(assistant, be in demand)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(assistant, be in high demand)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(assistant, be in demand)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(assistant, be in high demand)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(assistant, be in demand)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(assistant, be in high demand)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(assistant, be in demand)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(assistant, be in high demand)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(assistant, be in high demand)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(assistant, be in high demand)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(assistant, be in high demand)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(assistant, be in high demand)