association: be critical to formation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents group
Weight: 0.65
, organization
Weight: 0.64
, body
Weight: 0.60
, community
Weight: 0.59
Siblings joint stock company
Weight: 0.57
, federation
Weight: 0.55
, aba
Weight: 0.49
, ala
Weight: 0.46
, pca
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be critical to formation 1.00
be critical to formation of opinions 0.88
be critical to formation of political opinions 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(group, be critical to formation of political opinions)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(association, be critical to formation)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(association, be critical to formation)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(group, be critical to formation of political opinions)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(association, be critical to formation)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(group, be critical to formation of political opinions)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(group, be critical to formation of political opinions)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(association, be critical to formation)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(association, be critical to formation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(association, be critical to formation)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(association, be critical to formation)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(association, be critical to formation)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(association, be critical to formation of opinions)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(association, be critical to formation)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(association, be critical to formation of political opinions)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(association, be critical to formation)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(association, be critical to formation of political opinions)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(association, be critical to formation)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(association, be critical to formation of opinions)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(association, be critical to formation)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(association, be critical to formation of opinions)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(association, be critical to formation)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(association, be critical to formation of political opinions)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(association, be critical to formation)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(association, be critical to formation of opinions)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(association, be critical to formation)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(association, be critical to formation of political opinions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(association, be critical to formation)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(association, be critical to formation)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(association, be critical to formation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(association, be critical to formation)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(association, be critical to formation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(association, be critical to formation)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(group, be critical to formation of political opinions)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(association, be critical to formation)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(group, be critical to formation of political opinions)