association: be in construction industry formed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents group
Weight: 0.65
, organization
Weight: 0.64
, body
Weight: 0.60
, community
Weight: 0.59
Siblings joint stock company
Weight: 0.57
, federation
Weight: 0.55
, aba
Weight: 0.49
, ala
Weight: 0.46
, pca
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in construction industry formed 1.00
be in construction industry 0.95
is formed 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(community, is formed)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(association, be in construction industry formed)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(group, is formed)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(association, be in construction industry formed)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(organization, is formed)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(association, be in construction industry formed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(association, be in construction industry formed)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(organization, is formed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(association, be in construction industry formed)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(group, is formed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(association, be in construction industry formed)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(community, is formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(association, be in construction industry formed)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(community, is formed)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(association, be in construction industry formed)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(group, is formed)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(association, be in construction industry formed)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(organization, is formed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(community, is formed)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(association, be in construction industry formed)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(association, be in construction industry formed)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(group, is formed)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(association, be in construction industry formed)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(association, be in construction industry formed)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(organization, is formed)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(association, be in construction industry formed)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(association, be in construction industry formed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(association, be in construction industry formed)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(association, be in construction industry formed)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(association, be in construction industry formed)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(association, be in construction industry)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(association, be in construction industry formed)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(association, be in construction industry)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(association, be in construction industry formed)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(association, be in construction industry)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(association, be in construction industry formed)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(association, be in construction industry)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(association, be in construction industry formed)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(association, is formed)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(association, be in construction industry formed)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(association, is formed)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(association, be in construction industry formed)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(association, is formed)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(association, be in construction industry formed)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(association, is formed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(association, be in construction industry formed)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(association, be in construction industry formed)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(association, be in construction industry formed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(association, be in construction industry formed)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(association, be in construction industry formed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(association, be in construction industry formed)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(organization, is formed)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(association, be in construction industry formed)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(group, is formed)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(association, be in construction industry formed)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(community, is formed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(association, be in construction industry formed)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(organization, is formed)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(association, be in construction industry formed)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(group, is formed)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(association, be in construction industry formed)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(community, is formed)