assumption: be important in analysis

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents estimate
Weight: 0.63
, option
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, agreement
Weight: 0.59
Siblings expectation
Weight: 0.66
, isotropy
Weight: 0.35
, think
Weight: 0.33
, stock option
Weight: 0.33
, implication
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in analysis 1.00
be important in economic analysis 0.93
be important in research 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(implication, be important in research)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(assumption, be important in analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(implication, be important in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(implication, be important in research)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(assumption, be important in analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(assumption, be important in analysis)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(assumption, be important in analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(assumption, be important in economic analysis)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(assumption, be important in analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(assumption, be important in economic analysis)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(assumption, be important in analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(assumption, be important in economic analysis)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(assumption, be important in analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(assumption, be important in research)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(assumption, be important in analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in economic analysis)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(assumption, be important in analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(assumption, be important in research)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(assumption, be important in analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(assumption, be important in research)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(assumption, be important in analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in research)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(assumption, be important in analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(assumption, be important in analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in analysis)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(assumption, be important in analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(assumption, be important in analysis)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(implication, be important in research)