assumption: be important in critical thinking process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents estimate
Weight: 0.63
, option
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, agreement
Weight: 0.59
Siblings expectation
Weight: 0.66
, isotropy
Weight: 0.35
, think
Weight: 0.33
, stock option
Weight: 0.33
, implication
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in critical thinking process 1.00
be important in thinking process 0.95
be important in critical process 0.95
be important in process 0.90
be important to planning process 0.86
be very important in preparation 0.77
be important in theory 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(assumption, be important in critical thinking process)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(assumption, be important in critical thinking process)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(assumption, be important in critical thinking process)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in critical process)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(assumption, be important in critical thinking process)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(assumption, be important in critical process)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(assumption, be important in critical thinking process)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(assumption, be important in critical process)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(assumption, be important in critical thinking process)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(assumption, be important in process)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(assumption, be important in critical thinking process)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in process)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(assumption, be important in critical thinking process)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(assumption, be important in process)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(assumption, be important in critical thinking process)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in thinking process)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(assumption, be important in critical thinking process)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(assumption, be important in critical process)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(assumption, be important in critical thinking process)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(assumption, be important in thinking process)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(assumption, be important in critical thinking process)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(assumption, be important in process)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(assumption, be important in critical thinking process)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(assumption, be important in thinking process)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(assumption, be important in critical thinking process)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(assumption, be important in thinking process)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(assumption, be important in critical thinking process)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important to planning process)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(assumption, be important in critical thinking process)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(assumption, be important to planning process)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(assumption, be important in critical thinking process)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(assumption, be important in theory)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(assumption, be important in critical thinking process)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be very important in preparation)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(assumption, be important in critical thinking process)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(assumption, be important to planning process)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(assumption, be important in critical thinking process)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(assumption, be very important in preparation)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(assumption, be important in critical thinking process)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(assumption, be important to planning process)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(assumption, be important in critical thinking process)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in theory)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(assumption, be important in critical thinking process)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(assumption, be important in theory)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(assumption, be important in critical thinking process)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(assumption, be very important in preparation)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(assumption, be important in critical thinking process)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(assumption, be important in theory)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(assumption, be important in critical thinking process)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(assumption, be very important in preparation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(assumption, be important in critical thinking process)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(assumption, be important in critical thinking process)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in critical thinking process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(assumption, be important in critical thinking process)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(assumption, be important in critical thinking process)