assumption: be important in economic analysis

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents estimate
Weight: 0.63
, option
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, agreement
Weight: 0.59
Siblings expectation
Weight: 0.66
, isotropy
Weight: 0.35
, think
Weight: 0.33
, stock option
Weight: 0.33
, implication
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in economic analysis 1.00
be important in analysis 0.93
be important in economic theory 0.86
be important in research 0.80
be important in economics 0.78
be necessary in economics 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in economic analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(implication, be important in research)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in economic analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(expectation, be important in economics)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(assumption, be important in economic analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(implication, be important in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(implication, be important in research)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(assumption, be important in economic analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(expectation, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(expectation, be important in economics)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(assumption, be important in economic analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(assumption, be important in economic analysis)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(assumption, be important in economic analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(assumption, be important in analysis)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(assumption, be important in economic analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(assumption, be important in analysis)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(assumption, be important in economic analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(assumption, be important in analysis)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(assumption, be important in economic analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(assumption, be important in economic theory)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(assumption, be important in economic analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(assumption, be important in economic theory)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(assumption, be important in economic analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(assumption, be important in economic theory)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(assumption, be important in economic analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(assumption, be important in research)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(assumption, be important in economic analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(assumption, be important in research)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(assumption, be important in economic analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(assumption, be important in economics)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(assumption, be important in economic analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(assumption, be important in economics)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(assumption, be important in economic analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(assumption, be important in research)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(assumption, be important in economic analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(assumption, be necessary in economics)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(assumption, be important in economic analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(assumption, be important in economics)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(assumption, be important in economic analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(assumption, be necessary in economics)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(assumption, be important in economic analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in economic theory)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(assumption, be important in economic analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(assumption, be necessary in economics)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(assumption, be important in economic analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in analysis)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(assumption, be important in economic analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in research)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(assumption, be important in economic analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in economics)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(assumption, be important in economic analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be necessary in economics)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(assumption, be important in economic analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(assumption, be important in economic analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in economic analysis)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(assumption, be important in economic analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(assumption, be important in economic analysis)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in economic analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(expectation, be important in economics)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in economic analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(implication, be important in research)