assumption: be important in economic theory

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents estimate
Weight: 0.63
, option
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, agreement
Weight: 0.59
Siblings expectation
Weight: 0.66
, isotropy
Weight: 0.35
, think
Weight: 0.33
, stock option
Weight: 0.33
, implication
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in economic theory 1.00
be important in theory 0.91
be important in economic analysis 0.86
be important in economics 0.81
be necessary in economics 0.79
be important in science 0.77
is inference also necessary in field of psychology 0.76
is inference necessary in field of psychology 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in economic theory)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(expectation, be important in economics)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(assumption, be important in economic theory)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(expectation, be important in economics)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(expectation, be important in economics)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(assumption, be important in economic theory)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(assumption, be important in economic theory)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(assumption, be important in economic theory)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(assumption, be important in theory)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(assumption, be important in economic theory)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(assumption, be important in theory)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(assumption, be important in economic theory)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(assumption, be important in economic analysis)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(assumption, be important in economic theory)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(assumption, be important in economics)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(assumption, be important in economic theory)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(assumption, be important in theory)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(assumption, be important in economic theory)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(assumption, be necessary in economics)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(assumption, be important in economic theory)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in economics)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(assumption, be important in economic theory)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(assumption, be important in economics)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(assumption, be important in economic theory)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(assumption, be important in economics)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(assumption, be important in economic theory)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(assumption, be important in science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(assumption, be important in economic theory)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(assumption, be important in economic analysis)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(assumption, be important in economic theory)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(assumption, is inference necessary in field of psychology)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(assumption, be important in economic theory)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(assumption, is inference also necessary in field of psychology)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(assumption, be important in economic theory)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(assumption, be important in economic analysis)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(assumption, be important in economic theory)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(assumption, be necessary in economics)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(assumption, be important in economic theory)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(assumption, be important in economic theory)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(assumption, be necessary in economics)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(assumption, be important in economic theory)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(assumption, be important in science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(assumption, be important in economic theory)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in economic analysis)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(assumption, be important in economic theory)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in theory)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(assumption, be important in economic theory)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(assumption, be important in science)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(assumption, be important in economic theory)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be necessary in economics)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(assumption, be important in economic theory)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(assumption, is inference also necessary in field of psychology)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(assumption, be important in economic theory)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(assumption, is inference also necessary in field of psychology)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(assumption, be important in economic theory)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(assumption, is inference necessary in field of psychology)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(assumption, be important in economic theory)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(assumption, is inference necessary in field of psychology)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(assumption, be important in economic theory)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(assumption, is inference also necessary in field of psychology)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(assumption, be important in economic theory)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(assumption, is inference necessary in field of psychology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(assumption, be important in economic theory)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(assumption, be important in economic theory)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in economic theory)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(assumption, be important in economic theory)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(assumption, be important in economic theory)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in economic theory)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(expectation, be important in economics)