assumption: be important in economics

Property	Similarity
be important in economics	1.00
be necessary in economics	0.95
be made in economics	0.95
be important in economic theory	0.81
be important in science	0.81
be important in economic analysis	0.78
be important in theory	0.76

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.85

Typical(assumption, be important in economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(assumption, be necessary in economics)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.85

Typical(assumption, be important in economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(assumption, be made in economics)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(assumption, be important in economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(assumption, be made in economics)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(assumption, be important in economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Salient(assumption, be made in economics)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(assumption, be important in economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(assumption, be necessary in economics)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(assumption, be important in economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(assumption, be made in economics)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(assumption, be important in economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(assumption, be necessary in economics)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.85

Typical(assumption, be important in economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(assumption, be important in economic theory)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.85

Typical(assumption, be important in economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(assumption, be important in science)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(assumption, be important in economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(assumption, be important in economic theory)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.85

Typical(assumption, be important in economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(assumption, be important in theory)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.85

Typical(assumption, be important in economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(assumption, be important in economic analysis)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(assumption, be important in economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Salient(assumption, be important in economic theory)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(assumption, be important in economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(assumption, be necessary in economics)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(assumption, be important in economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(assumption, be important in science)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(assumption, be important in economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(assumption, be important in science)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(assumption, be important in economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(assumption, be important in theory)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(assumption, be important in economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in economic theory)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(assumption, be important in economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(assumption, be important in economic analysis)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(assumption, be important in economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in science)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(assumption, be important in economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(assumption, be important in theory)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(assumption, be important in economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(assumption, be important in economic analysis)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(assumption, be important in economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in economic analysis)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(assumption, be important in economics) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in theory)

Parents	estimate Weight: 0.63 , option Weight: 0.60 , thing Weight: 0.59 , agreement Weight: 0.59
Siblings	expectation Weight: 0.66 , isotropy Weight: 0.35 , think Weight: 0.33 , stock option Weight: 0.33 , implication Weight: 0.33

assumption: be important in economics

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings