assumption: be important in research

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents estimate
Weight: 0.63
, option
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, agreement
Weight: 0.59
Siblings expectation
Weight: 0.66
, isotropy
Weight: 0.35
, think
Weight: 0.33
, stock option
Weight: 0.33
, implication
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in research 1.00
be important in analysis 0.83
be important in science 0.82
be important in economic analysis 0.80
be very important in preparation of feasibility study 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(implication, be important in research)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(assumption, be important in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(implication, be important in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(implication, be important in research)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(assumption, be important in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(assumption, be important in research)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(assumption, be important in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(assumption, be important in analysis)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(assumption, be important in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(assumption, be important in science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(assumption, be important in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(assumption, be important in economic analysis)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(assumption, be important in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(assumption, be important in science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(assumption, be important in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(assumption, be important in analysis)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(assumption, be important in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(assumption, be important in science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(assumption, be important in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(assumption, be very important in preparation of feasibility study)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(assumption, be important in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(assumption, be important in analysis)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(assumption, be important in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(assumption, be important in economic analysis)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(assumption, be important in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(assumption, be important in economic analysis)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(assumption, be important in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(assumption, be very important in preparation of feasibility study)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(assumption, be important in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(assumption, be very important in preparation of feasibility study)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(assumption, be important in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in science)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(assumption, be important in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in economic analysis)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(assumption, be important in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be very important in preparation of feasibility study)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(assumption, be important in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in analysis)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(assumption, be important in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(assumption, be important in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in research)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(assumption, be important in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(assumption, be important in research)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(implication, be important in research)