assumption: be important in science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents estimate
Weight: 0.63
, option
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, agreement
Weight: 0.59
Siblings expectation
Weight: 0.66
, isotropy
Weight: 0.35
, think
Weight: 0.33
, stock option
Weight: 0.33
, implication
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in science 1.00
be important in research 0.82
be important in economics 0.81
be important in economic theory 0.77
be necessary in economics 0.77
be important in theory 0.77
be made in economics 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(implication, be important in research)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(expectation, be important in economics)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(assumption, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(implication, be important in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(implication, be important in research)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(assumption, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(expectation, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(expectation, be important in economics)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(assumption, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(assumption, be important in science)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(assumption, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(assumption, be important in research)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(assumption, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(assumption, be important in economics)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(assumption, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(assumption, be important in economic theory)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(assumption, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(assumption, be important in theory)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(assumption, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(assumption, be necessary in economics)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(assumption, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(assumption, be important in economics)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(assumption, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(assumption, be important in research)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(assumption, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(assumption, be important in research)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(assumption, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(assumption, be important in economics)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(assumption, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(assumption, be made in economics)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(assumption, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(assumption, be important in economic theory)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(assumption, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(assumption, be important in economic theory)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(assumption, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(assumption, be made in economics)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(assumption, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(assumption, be important in theory)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(assumption, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(assumption, be necessary in economics)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(assumption, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(assumption, be necessary in economics)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(assumption, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(assumption, be important in theory)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(assumption, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(assumption, be made in economics)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(assumption, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in research)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(assumption, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in economics)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(assumption, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be made in economics)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(assumption, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in economic theory)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(assumption, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be necessary in economics)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(assumption, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in theory)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(assumption, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(assumption, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(assumption, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(assumption, be important in science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(expectation, be important in economics)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(assumption, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(implication, be important in research)